IIACI
Janeann Dill, Ph.D., MFA, MA
Founder and Institute Director

_________________________________________
The artist is a creative intellectual,
not an inspired idiot. 
1956 Brown Report, Harvard University

Your Subtitle text
Research and Publication

_______________________________________________________________

Excerpts from 2008 Lecture© 
by Janeann Dill

For Martin Heidegger, the philosopher, we know that questioning and thinking are self-justifying. To question clears the way to think.  Having no certain destination in mind, to be underway is a response to that call. 

Briefly and extreme in its abbreviation, I want to invoke, as example, one of Heidegger’s university lectures
. Describing a cabinetmaker’s apprentice, Heidegger equates the teaching-learning process of handicraft, poetry, and thinking to focus his students on aspects of relatedness as a path --- a path to alert his students to the dangers of learning without responding to essentials.  Heidegger cast such an approach to learning as “empty busywork.”

For Heidegger, handicraft and thinking are linked:  thinking is akin to building a cabinet. Grasping is a function of the hand although it cannot be said to be its essence. The hand grasps and catches or pushes and pulls, reaches and extends, receives and welcomes, and "not just things.”  Only a being who can speak, i.e., think, can achieve works of handicraft. Heidegger locates “all the work of the hand” as rooted in thinking.*



©JaneannDill all rights reserved
*
See Heidegger's What Is Called Thinking?

_______________________________________________________________
HERE IS AN EXCERPT FROM AN ARTICLE WRITTEN IN 2005 THAT WAS PUBLISHED IN FPS (CANADIAN) ANIMATION MAGAZINE. 
The feature film produced by Tim Burton, "9," was once a short film by Shane Acker that garnered "Best of Show" at SIGGRAPH.  With Burton's feature release in 2009, here are my thoughts about "9" then!
_______________________________________________


Immersed in Domes, Falling Bodies and Stereo Vision: Where's the Gravity?

     "I think SIGGRAPH 2005 was meant to prepare our bodies for space travel and, doubly, for the loss of earth’s natural environment by redefining 'nature.'  [ ... ]  

9, a beautiful and poignant film by Shane Acker, received top honours as Best of Show by the jury (on which our esteemed editor sat). While viewing the film, I couldn’t help but think of Tim Burton and Henry Selick’s Nightmare Before Christmas and, somewhat, the Brothers Quay, both in imagery and sensitivity.  In fact, these influences alongside John Lasseter and his PIXAR productions were spread throughout the shorts, probably largely due to the number of films screened in the festival that were student films, and secondly, because these animation artists are of the age to have seen these works as children so that these figures now replace the Disney film as early influences. Beautiful in 9 is the choreography of a kind of mime-movement of its character, who faces a Gollum-like skeleton portrayed as a stalking force of death. In contrast to Nightmare, this film is of a sombre, industrial colour palatte and reads as a futuristic dismissal of warring skeletons, textures and mechanical structures—a fabricated rebirth of wandering into a circle of light—the hero’s journey. Its universal theme both grounds the story and differentiates it from its predecessors. It was only after returning home that I read Tim Burton had picked up the film to develop a feature. How much of the feature version will remain Acker’s will be interesting to note after he is absorbed into the machinery of bigger budget Hollywood.  That said, what might or might not happen in the evolution of 9 as a feature can not diminish the beauty of the animation of Acker’s ten-minute version."--- Janeann Dill 

fps, Festival Watch feature article, Emru Townsend, Ed., pp 14-16.

_______________________________________________

To download the complete .pdf of the Sept. 2005 issue of fps, go here:

_______________________________________________________________
Stay tuned for articles and interviews.  
The commitment here is to scholarship that may, otherwise, be difficult to publish because it is interdisciplinary in scope, historically marginalized, and/or pushes the limits of current focus.

As example (but not limited to): Panels & Lectures